options
********************************************************************************

MAQAO 2.17.5 - 1fc3c3bc2da97f29f4ddcaee9d9bbd1f49cfe632::20230710-172033 || 2023/07/10

maqao OV -S1 c=config_nokp_svp.lua xp=OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp 

CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_15" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_16" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_17" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_18" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_19" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_20" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_21" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_22" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_23" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_24" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_25" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_26" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_27" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_28" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_29" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
CMD:  I_MPI_PIN_PROCESSOR_LIST=allcores:map=scatter  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof  --xp="/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/tools/lprof_npsu_run_30" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 52" ppn=52   -- /scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/binaries/cp2k.psmp -i mol22_s1.inp
In run run_0, 2075 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

1484 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_1, 2093 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

209 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_2, 2091 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

131 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_3, 2105 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

100 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_4, 2127 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

66 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_5, 2115 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

61 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_6, 2092 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

55 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_7, 2077 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

45 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_8, 2079 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

34 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_9, 2096 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

28 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_10, 2109 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

32 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_11, 2109 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

25 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_12, 2086 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

26 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_13, 2141 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

27 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_14, 2081 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

24 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_15, 2082 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

22 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_16, 2097 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

22 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_17, 2085 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

24 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_18, 2095 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_19, 2071 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

14 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_20, 2126 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

13 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_21, 2106 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

23 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_22, 2129 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_23, 2079 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

17 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_24, 2067 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_25, 2102 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

13 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_26, 2096 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_27, 2096 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

15 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_28, 2088 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_29, 2089 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run run_30, 2106 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

CMD:  /home/eoseret/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao otter  -input=/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/scratch/eoseret/cp2k-2023.1/benchmarks/sample_mol22/no_kpoints/svp/OVS1_skx_MPI52_nokp_svp/OTTER/output_manifest.csv

×