Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (17.08 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 2.40 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information
Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 0.03% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present. Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.
[ 3.00 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=native is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (17.33%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (16.15%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (16.15%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (1.18%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (16.15%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 20 - permute3d_1.locus440.exe | Execution Time: 16 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ►Data Access Issues | 16 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 8 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 16 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 16 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 8 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 16 |
| ►Loop 18 - permute3d_1.locus440.exe | Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Loop 16 - permute3d_1.locus440.exe | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.00 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 18 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (12 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 12 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 16 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 18 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (12 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 12 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 16 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Loop 17 - permute3d_1.locus440.exe | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.34 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (6 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 6 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 10 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (6 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 6 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 10 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |