********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.10 - 4ac1b2f5b5fdb6964b480406b6b2a13ea0924e38::20241106-170444 || 2024/11/06
maqao OV -S1 envv_OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 envv_OMP_PLACES=cores envv_OMP_PROC_BIND=close xp=OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64 -- ./permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CPY: [true] ./permute3d_1.locus440.exe --> /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_15" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_16" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_17" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_18" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_19" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_20" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_21" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_22" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_23" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_24" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_25" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_26" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_27" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_28" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_29" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/tools/lprof_npsu_run_30" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_64x64x64/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 600000 -x 64 -y 64 -z 64
In run run_0, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0045825922861695% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
17 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.064156292763073% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0048032703343779% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0048032703343779% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0087930471636355% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0027055530808866% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011273506097496% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019894420984201% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010910697281361% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013638372765854% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0088941757567227% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010901184286922% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013626480940729% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_7, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0085822721011937% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00066017481731251% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010556947439909% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_9, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0073611559346319% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00066919601522386% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_10, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0066051525063812% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013210305478424% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_11, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0034126185346395% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_12, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.004508157260716% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00064402248244733% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_13, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010763906408101% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0006727441214025% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_14, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01066573895514% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00066660868469626% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_15, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0053815501742064% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0020180814899504% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0098594073206186% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013145875418559% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_17, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010045604314655% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_18, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0084950090385973% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00065346219344065% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_19, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010571946855634% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00066074664937332% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_20, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0097017001826316% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_21, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0065009379759431% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00065009377431124% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_22, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010143012739718% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00067620084155351% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_23, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0074361993465573% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013520362554118% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_24, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0061172464629635% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00067969405790791% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_25, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0087612844072282% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0026905958075076% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00067264895187691% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_27, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010558264330029% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_28, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.012266173027456% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00068145408295095% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_29, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0086374124512076% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00066441635135561% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_30, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0086253844201564% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013269822811708% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
