********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.10 - 4ac1b2f5b5fdb6964b480406b6b2a13ea0924e38::20241106-170444 || 2024/11/06
maqao OV -S1 envv_OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 envv_OMP_PLACES=cores envv_OMP_PROC_BIND=close xp=OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96 -- ./permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CPY: [true] ./permute3d_1.locus440.exe --> /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_15" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_16" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_17" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_18" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_19" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_20" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_21" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_22" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_23" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_24" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_25" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_26" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_27" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_28" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_29" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=76 OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2.20.10/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/tools/lprof_npsu_run_30" --mpi-command="" --collect-topology -- /home/eoseret/3dtransp_code/OS1_locus440_OMP76_96x96x96/binaries/permute3d_1.locus440.exe -n 200000 -x 96 -y 96 -z 96
In run run_0, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.005445102462545% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
18 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.049686561338603% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011043952661566% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0036813176120632% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0049346515443176% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00070495018735528% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0095123087521643% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00073171610711142% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0099058265332133% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014151179930195% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0069703441113233% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003485584165901% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013942336663604% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_7, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072940008249134% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.002188200247474% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0094761834479868% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_9, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0066251035314053% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00073612260166556% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_10, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010469962959178% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_11, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0095735343638808% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014728514943272% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_12, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0065893016871997% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014642892638221% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_13, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01019456598442% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_14, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0054688502568751% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00068360625300556% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_15, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0029625904862769% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00074064760701731% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0094267772510648% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072513672057539% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_17, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0083217157516629% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00069347635144368% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_18, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011568221263587% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014460275415331% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_19, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0098240762017667% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_20, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.008485245052725% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00070710375439376% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_21, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0059158480726182% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0014789620181546% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_22, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.006977099692449% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_23, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0078705814667047% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_24, 3 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011670742183924% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072942138649523% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_25, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0036069820635021% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072139641270041% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0099367623915896% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.001419537467882% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_27, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0028430701931939% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_28, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.004108774010092% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00068479561014101% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_29, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0058103624614887% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00072629534406587% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_30, 2 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0095488156657666% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00068205822026357% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
