********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.16.3 - Build information not available || 2023/02/19
/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS c=config_NEON.lua xp=OV1_WS_armclang_neon --replace
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core" ppn=1 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 --bind-to core" ppn=2 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core" ppn=4 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core" ppn=8 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 16 --bind-to core" ppn=16 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 32 --bind-to core" ppn=32 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 64 --bind-to core" ppn=64 -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0 -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
In run 1x1, 123 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
168 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x1, 146 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
160 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 4x1, 173 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 185 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
69 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 191 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
94 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 219 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
74 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 254 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon/OTTER/output_manifest.csv
In run 1x1, 123 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
168 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x1, 146 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
160 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 4x1, 173 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 185 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
69 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 191 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
94 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 219 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
74 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 254 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.16.5 - Build information not available || 2023/03/05
/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS xp=OV1_WS_armclang_neon_G3E
In run 1x1, 123 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
168 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x1, 146 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
160 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 4x1, 173 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 185 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
69 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 191 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
94 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 219 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
74 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 254 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon_G3E/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_neon_G3E/OTTER/output_manifest.csv
In run 1x1, 123 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
168 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x1, 146 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
160 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 4x1, 173 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 185 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
69 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 191 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
94 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 219 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
74 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 254 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
103 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
