********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.0 - b107544c0173fc3785aa7d997ff783dc12b975d2::20250527-133805 || 2025/05/27
/home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao OV -R1 dbg=1 --with-FLOPS -WS c=config_G4.json xp=OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24/
CPY: [true] ./bin/Linux_AArch64/xhpl --> /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:4:node:PE=1" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=NEON_SVE_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=4 -- /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:4:node:PE=2" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=NEON_SVE_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=4 -- /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:4:node:PE=4" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=NEON_SVE_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=4 -- /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:4:node:PE=8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=NEON_SVE_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=4 -- /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:4:node:PE=16" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=NEON_SVE_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=4 -- /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.aarch64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:4:node:PE=24" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=NEON_SVE_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=4 -- /home/eoseret/hpl-2.3/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_G4_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
In run OMP1, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.026424103512909% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
112 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.069323471476309% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP2, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01479173869302% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
55 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015270428111762% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP4, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0087993383076536% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00056639644026291% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP8, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015620517464413% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
27 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00053251707322488% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP16, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.021973799578518% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00019340490689501% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP24, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.028456610136345% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0001295246911468% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
