********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.0 - b107544c0173fc3785aa7d997ff783dc12b975d2::20250527-133805 || 2025/05/27
/home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao OV -R1 dbg=1 --with-FLOPS -WS c=config_GNR.json xp=OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32/
CPY: [true] ./hpl-2.3/bin/Linux_Intel64/xhpl --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=6 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=6 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=6 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=6 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=6 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=6 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_GNR_OMP1to32//binaries/xhpl
In run OMP1, 70 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.085031997863552% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
95 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.079835386975901% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP2, 85 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.10419758098578% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
76 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.019403291698836% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP4, 91 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.11786824208684% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
33 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0033180431419169% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP8, 113 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.086853121913009% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0021291198645486% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP16, 110 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.070779834866699% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00089004233086598% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP32, 122 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.067725448230704% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
30 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013231628508947% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
