********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.0 - b107544c0173fc3785aa7d997ff783dc12b975d2::20250527-133805 || 2025/05/27
/home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao OV -R1 dbg=1 --with-FLOPS -WS c=config_Zen5.json xp=OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24/
CPY: [true] ./hpl-2.3/bin/Linux_Intel64_Zen5_AOCL/xhpl --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:8:node:PE=1" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:8:node:PE=2" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:8:node:PE=4" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:8:node:PE=8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:8:node:PE=16" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_PLACES=cores /home/eoseret/maqao.x86_64.2025.1.0/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by ppr:8:node:PE=24" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/linpack/OV1_hpl_N100K_NB384_Zen5_OMP1to24//binaries/xhpl
In run OMP1, 26 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011612673915806% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
289 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.19414794233307% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP2, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02058429029421% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
111 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.016183196086786% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP4, 26 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.016369459648558% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
73 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0050843255885411% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP8, 26 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.017626582204684% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
67 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0037138447769394% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP16, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.012779997556208% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
52 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0020927802979713% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run OMP24, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.019412327135797% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
50 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0016912241590035% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
