Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (135.65 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -mcpu is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (99.06%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (8.52%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (97.14%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (1.92%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (97.14%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
►52 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 66 | 8.52 | 95.24 | 96.43 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 16 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 64 | ||||
○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►515 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 16 | 6.96 | 98.08 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 16 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►49 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 64 | 6.74 | 100 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 16 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 64 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►538 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 32 | 4.71 | 100 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►584 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 4 | 4.62 | 100 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►543 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 32 | 4.48 | 100 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►606 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 32 | 4.33 | 92.31 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►518 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 32 | 4.06 | 100 | 100 |
○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
►540 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 2 | 3.89 | 0 | 22.47 |
○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
►522 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 1000 | 3.72 | 0 | 20 |
○ | [SA] Too many paths (at least 1000 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are at least 1000 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point. | 1000 | ||||
○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 |