********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - d7816a4ef31d96c8cb7cb54a3ec2554ac0d7ef52::20250912-183832 || 2025/09/12
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/config.json --with-FLOPS lprof_params="btm=fp" --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 120 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 126 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 144 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 168 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 192 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 216 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 240 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 256 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3573/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1758155125/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
In run 6x1, 33 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.023682985833148% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
64 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044500535870611% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 96x1, 42 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015381328479634% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
119 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0072499790821893% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 120x1, 49 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01524938318471% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
80 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003089559102591% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 126x1, 45 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.011403025928303% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
45 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0013649507618539% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 144x1, 48 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.014933059104806% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
43 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0011466456235212% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 168x1, 53 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.016247938277957% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
65 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0020408037635207% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 192x1, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01446703835245% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
70 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0017350670586893% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 216x1, 46 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0099601344390976% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
53 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012685076326307% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 240x1, 48 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0079157036379911% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
47 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0011405913028284% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 256x1, 41 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0091940177026117% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
33 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0007120651534933% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
