********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - d7816a4ef31d96c8cb7cb54a3ec2554ac0d7ef52::20250912-183832 || 2025/09/12
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/config.json --with-FLOPS lprof_params="btm=fp" --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/binaries/icx_2/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 64 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 128 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 160 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 192 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3649/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx_2/oneview_results_1758148104/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
In run 8x1, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.024077134818072% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
57 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.037348129262682% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 96x1, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 128x1, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 160x1, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 192x1, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
