Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (47.07 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option -O3 is used
To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O3)
[ 3 / 3 ] Helper debug compilation options -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer are used
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations and -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=native is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (99.87%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (51.92%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (47.69%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 0 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (52.18%) greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage (47.69%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ►1247 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 18 | 51.92 | 17.35 | 14.67 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 6 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 12 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ►1248 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 2 | 19.64 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ►1399 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 24 | 10.39 | 11.11 | 13.89 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 4 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 16 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ►1052 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 6 | 8.21 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [DA] Ratio time (ORIG)/time (DL1) is greater than 3 (3.88) - Perform blocking. Perform array restructuring. There are 0 issues (= non unit stride or indirect memory access) costing 2 point each, with an additional malus of 4 points due to the ORIG/DL1 ratio. | 4 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ►940 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 7 | 7.92 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [DA] Ratio time (ORIG)/time (DL1) is greater than 3 (4.04) - Perform blocking. Perform array restructuring. There are 0 issues (= non unit stride or indirect memory access) costing 2 point each, with an additional malus of 5 points due to the ORIG/DL1 ratio. | 5 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ►835 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 0.52 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►1165 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 0.45 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►1398 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 12 | 0.2 | 0 | 12.38 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ►847 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 0.15 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►841 | exec | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 0.15 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 |