[ 0 / 9 ] Compilation options are not available

Compilation options are an important optimization leverage but ONE-View is not able to analyze them.

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (16.67 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Security settings from the host restrict profiling. Some metrics will be missing or incomplete.

Current value for kernel.perf_event_paranoid is 4. If possible, set it to 1 or check with your system administrator which flag can be used to achieve this.

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.51 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 0 / 1 ] Lstopo was not found on the host (either not installed or not loaded). The Topology lstopo report will not be generated.

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (1.11%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 4 ] A significant amount of threads are idle (12.94%)

On average, more than 10% of observed threads are idle. Such threads are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 3 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (89.26%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 0 / 4 ] Loop profile is flat

No hotspot found in the application (greatest loop coverage is 1.07%), and the twenty hottest loops cumulated coverage is lower than 20% of the application profiled time (1.10%)

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (1.10%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 0 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (0.00%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 3 / 3 ] Functions mostly use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover less than 10% of application walltime (5.04%)

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.01%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (1.10%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)