********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.1 - e26c8ffcefb997f114892e36591c060f98f53e6a::20240206-190005 || 2024/02/06
/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao OV -R1 --with-prompt=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so --with-FLOPS --with-scalability=strong --with-topology c=config_scal.json xp=oneview_results_scal
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/binaries/icx_5/exec --> /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec
CMD: I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=48 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -np 2" -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=2 -- /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
In run 2x1, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
21 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x48, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: cd "/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/171-147-9160/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_run_1711486959"; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=48 I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto:scatter OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread mpirun -np 2 /home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/binaries/exec --groups 1024 --procs 2,1,1
CMD: /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/OTTER/output_manifest.csv
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.4 - fe14d3adfb3256b508e58d35c4c7bad8c581967c::20240703-182948 || 2024/07/03
/home/eoseret/maqao_fe14d3 OV -R1 -force-static-analysis --with-prompt=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so --with-FLOPS --with-scalability=strong --with-topology xp=oneview_results_scal
In run 2x1, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.055496051252703% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
26 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.065449277855805% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045239765691804% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0022215428616618% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.05605090392055% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00079785240814088% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.037947084114421% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00096794923592825% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047396526773809% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00192408284056% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.05494588217698% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00080038033775055% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x48, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044904472655617% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0008489798856317% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.4 - fe14d3adfb3256b508e58d35c4c7bad8c581967c::20240703-182948 || 2024/07/03
/home/eoseret/maqao_fe14d3 OV -R1 -force-static-analysis --with-prompt=/home/eoseret/MAQAO/libprompt/libprompt_icx.so --with-FLOPS --with-scalability=strong --with-topology xp=oneview_results_scal
In run 2x1, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.055496051252703% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
26 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.065449277855805% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045239765691804% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0022215428616618% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.05605090392055% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00079785240814088% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.037947084114421% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00096794923592825% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047396526773809% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00192408284056% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.05494588217698% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00080038033775055% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x48, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044904472655617% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0008489798856317% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/eoseret/maqao_fe14d3 otter -input=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/qaas_runs_CPU_9468/Kripke_DDR/intel/Kripke/run/oneview_runs/compilers/icx_5/oneview_results_scal/OTTER/output_manifest.csv
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.20.10 - 2d1721eb3a4dc4d7a46dcf0faf75ed388143a93a::20241107-133544 || 2024/11/07
/home/eoseret/maqao_7nov24 OV -refresh xp=oneview_results_scal
In run 2x1, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.055496051252703% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
26 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.065449277855805% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x2, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045239765691804% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0022215428616618% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x4, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.05605090392055% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00079785240814088% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x8, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.037947084114421% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00096794923592825% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x16, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047396526773809% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
10 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00192408284056% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x32, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.05494588217698% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00080038033775055% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 2x48, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044904472655617% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0008489798856317% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
