********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.4 - 9c55c8b14007b328890413aa6ef8916a305281ee::20250512-200501 || 2025/05/12
/home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 OV -R1 WP=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so --with-FLOPS --with-scalability=strong xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5 c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/config_scal.json
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/kripke_aocc_v2 --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology ppn=8 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
In run 8x1, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.050786381732905% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
32 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.052598534690333% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x2, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.040098850498907% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0060841217782581% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x4, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047072302739252% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019521250942489% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x8, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.040753179680905% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0028964352386538% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x16, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.039750448690029% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015159422327997% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x24, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.033252731271205% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0010989844304277% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads mpirun -n 8 /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads mpirun -n 8 /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads mpirun -n 8 /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads mpirun -n 8 /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads mpirun -n 8 /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_ee7fa9/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_clang.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_PLACES=threads mpirun -n 8 /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.4 - 1d4f90ac7feaf186f239631de712911b28c5c6ea::20250513-171646 || 2025/05/13
/home/eoseret/maqao_20250514 OV -R1 -WP -WS xp=OV1_WP_WS_kripke_Zen5
In run 8x1, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.050786381732905% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
32 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.052598534690333% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x2, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.040098850498907% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
16 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0060841217782581% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x4, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047072302739252% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019521250942489% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x8, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.040753179680905% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0028964352386538% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x16, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.039750448690029% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
11 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015159422327997% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x24, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.033252731271205% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0010989844304277% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
