********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.4 - 9c55c8b14007b328890413aa6ef8916a305281ee::20250512-200501 || 2025/05/12
/home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 OV -S1 --with-FLOPS envv_OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 envv_OMP_PLACES=threads envv_OMP_PROC_BIND=spread envv_I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto "mpi-command=mpirun -n 8" ppn=8 xp=OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24 -- ./kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CPY: [true] ./kripke_aocc_v2 --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_13" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_14" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_15" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_16" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_17" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_18" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_19" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_20" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_21" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_22" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_23" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_24" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_25" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_26" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_27" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_28" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_29" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=24 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/maqao_20250513 lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/tools/lprof_npsu_run_30" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8" --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/OS1_kripke_Zen5_8x24/binaries/kripke_aocc_v2 --groups 1024 --zones 24,16,16 --procs 2,2,2
In run run_0, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.026682555617299% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
85 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.039258479271666% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.020329436374595% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
20 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019499500922393% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01829200561042% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
23 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003187691734638% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027078131650342% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
18 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019341667793924% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02729378650838% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
15 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0016629991296213% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.024116625529132% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00055427305051124% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 21 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027520072675543% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019261009001639% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_7, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027386453119107% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
12 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.001383195296512% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8, 24 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.029670158546651% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
13 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0015246157272486% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_9, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.029735580348642% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00097232594271192% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_10, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.023879099011538% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00055523331684525% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_11, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.026454232473043% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0012397669343045% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_12, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.028870322712464% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00097185852064285% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_13, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.028053471440217% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00097735662711783% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_14, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.019238777866121% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0005576112162089% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_15, 20 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.024149337987183% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00055483853793702% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16, 25 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02858479868155% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00013914264854975% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_17, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02763005559973% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00041656600660644% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_18, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02681460986787% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
9 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0011116733803646% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_19, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.025519653398078% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00096557779761498% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_20, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.028306316220551% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00069410432479344% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_21, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027217501919949% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0004165889986325% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_22, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.025121939906967% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00082830840256065% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_23, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.025183105957694% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00041737088758963% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_24, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.026533751137322% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00097226491197942% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_25, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.030539232378942% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0009714474726934% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.023919393657707% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00083421729505063% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_27, 19 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.023158747557318% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00069800516939722% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_28, 16 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.026881925674388% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00082265250966884% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_29, 18 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027962644860963% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00055321856052614% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_30, 17 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.028721492213663% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.000414079069742% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
