Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (97.50 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -x Host is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (99.99%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good
CPU cores are active 99.75% of time
[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good
On average, more than 99.75% of observed threads are actually active
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.98%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (91.30%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (98.97%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (1.02%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (98.97%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 18 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 91 % - Vectorization Ratio: 57.89 % - Vector Length Use: 18.86 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Loop 9 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 7 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.61 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Loop 17 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 94.12 % - Vector Length Use: 23.90 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (53.55 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -x Host is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (95.40%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good
CPU cores are active 96.69% of time
[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good
On average, more than 193.36% of observed threads are actually active
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.88%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (87.23%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (94.39%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (1.01%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (94.39%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 18 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 87 % - Vectorization Ratio: 57.89 % - Vector Length Use: 18.86 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Loop 9 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 7 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.61 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Loop 17 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 94.12 % - Vector Length Use: 23.90 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (31.98 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -x Host is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (87.95%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good
CPU cores are active 92.39% of time
[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good
On average, more than 369.50% of observed threads are actually active
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.70%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (80.65%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (87.11%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.84%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (87.11%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 18 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 80 % - Vectorization Ratio: 57.89 % - Vector Length Use: 18.86 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Loop 9 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 6 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.61 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Loop 17 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 94.12 % - Vector Length Use: 23.90 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (20.51 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -x Host is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (75.88%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (85.93%)
CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.
[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good
On average, more than 687.16% of observed threads are actually active
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.46%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (69.65%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (75.17%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.71%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (75.17%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 18 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 69 % - Vectorization Ratio: 57.89 % - Vector Length Use: 18.86 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Loop 9 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.61 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Loop 17 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 94.12 % - Vector Length Use: 23.90 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (18.37 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -x Host is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (70.82%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (82.76%)
CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.
[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good
On average, more than 827.24% of observed threads are actually active
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.32%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (65.02%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (70.11%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.70%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (70.11%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 18 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 65 % - Vectorization Ratio: 57.89 % - Vector Length Use: 18.86 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 260 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ►Inefficient Vectorization | 8 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (SHUFFLE/PERM) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 8 |
| ►Loop 9 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.61 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 12 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 |
| ►Loop 17 - kmeans-icpx-O3-aggressive | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 94.12 % - Vector Length Use: 23.90 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 262 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (256 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 256 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 260 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |