********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.0 - b37ee48e971324d4eaf9054a5a16e1bfd5003152::20240201-180403 || 2024/02/01
maqao oneview -dbg=1 -xp=recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala -R1 -WS -c=config.lua --with-prompt=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so -- ./../qmckl_bench/build/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CPY: [true] ./../qmckl_bench/build/bench_aos --> /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos
CPY: [true] /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/qmckl_bench/build/libqmckl/__install/lib/libqmckl.so --> /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/libs/libqmckl.so
CPY: [true] /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/qmckl_bench/build/libqmckl/__install/lib/libqmckl.so.0 --> /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/libs/libqmckl.so.0
CPY: [true] /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/qmckl_bench/build/libqmckl/__install/lib/libqmckl.so.0.0.0 --> /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/libs/libqmckl.so.0.0.0
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=26 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao lprof --xp="/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="" -ldi=libqmckl.so,libqmckl.so.0,libqmckl.so.0.0.0 -- /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
In run run_0, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 8 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=26 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: cd "."; OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so TARGET_PARALLEL_SECTION=ALL OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 /home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/binaries/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
CMD: /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/OTTER/output_manifest.csv -dbg=1
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.0 - b37ee48e971324d4eaf9054a5a16e1bfd5003152::20240201-180403 || 2024/02/01
maqao oneview --refresh -xp=recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/
In run run_0, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 8 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala//OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala//OTTER/output_manifest.csv
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.0 - b37ee48e971324d4eaf9054a5a16e1bfd5003152::20240201-180403 || 2024/02/01
maqao oneview --refresh -xp=recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/
In run run_0, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 8 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala//OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala//OTTER/output_manifest.csv
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.0 - b37ee48e971324d4eaf9054a5a16e1bfd5003152::20240201-180403 || 2024/02/01
maqao oneview --refresh -xp=recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala/
In run run_0, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 8 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
CMD: /home/kcamus/MAQAODEV/bin/maqao otter -input=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala//OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/kcamus/comparative/qmckl/runs_12fev/recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala//OTTER/output_manifest.csv
********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.19.0 - b37ee48e971324d4eaf9054a5a16e1bfd5003152::20240201-180403 || 2024/02/01
maqao oneview -dbg=1 -xp=recommended_aos_icc_o1-52_scala -R1 -WS --with-prompt=/home/kcamus/MAQAO/src/maqao/libprompt/libprompt_icc.so -- ./../qmckl_bench/build/bench_aos ../qmckl_bench/data/Alz_large.h5
In run run_0, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_1, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_2, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_3, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4, 1 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_5, 8 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_6, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
