options

bench_jastrow - 2024-02-13 11:58:20 - MAQAO 2.19.0

Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (190.08 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 2.19 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have good performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 2.19 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 27.07% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present. Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 2.19 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (27.37%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (5.18%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (23.71%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (3.66%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (23.71%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

Optimizer

Loop IDModuleAnalysisPenalty ScoreCoverage (%)Vectorization
Ratio (%)
Vector Length
Use (%)
292libqmckl.so.0.0.0Inefficient vectorization.65.1810050
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
259libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.84.345018.75
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
1059libqmckl.so.0.0.0Inefficient vectorization.23.510050
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
36bench_jastrowInefficient vectorization.23.2710050
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
229libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.1122.3420.7915.41
[SA] Too many paths (106 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 106 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.110
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option.0
1139libqmckl.so.0.0.0Inefficient vectorization.21.1310050
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
1101libqmckl.so.0.0.0Inefficient vectorization.2110050
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
232libqmckl.so.0.0.0Inefficient vectorization.20.8610050
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
958libqmckl.so.0.0.0Inefficient vectorization.520.710046.67
[SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each.32
[SA] Presence of expensive instructions (GATHER/SCATTER) - Use array restructuring. There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each.16
[SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
216libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.190.58.3313.02
[SA] Too many paths (13 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 13 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points.17
[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option.0
×