options

bench_jastrow - 2024-02-26 17:23:49 - MAQAO 2.19.2

Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (321.8 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0.36 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 0.36 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 88.08% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present. Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0.36 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -mcpu=native ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (8.15%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 0 / 4 ] Loop profile is flat

No hotspot found in the application (greatest loop coverage is 1.34%), and the twenty hottest loops cumulated coverage is lower than 20% of the application profiled time (7.75%)

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (7.75%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.40%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (7.75%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

Optimizer

Loop IDModuleAnalysisPenalty ScoreCoverage (%)Vectorization
Ratio (%)
Vector Length
Use (%)
276libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected01.34050
335libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.100.9192.3196.15
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Bottleneck in the front end - If loop size is very small (rare occurrences), perform unroll and jam. If loop size is large, perform loop splitting. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
393libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.20.8195.6597.83
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
395libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.20.6895.8397.92
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
394libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.20.6395.8397.92
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
333libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.80.5894.1297.06
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Bottleneck in the front end - If loop size is very small (rare occurrences), perform unroll and jam. If loop size is large, perform loop splitting. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
396libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.60.595.8397.92
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Bottleneck in the front end - If loop size is very small (rare occurrences), perform unroll and jam. If loop size is large, perform loop splitting. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
323libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected00.4050
1044libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access.20.3295.4597.73
[SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points.2
Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed.0
1079libqmckl.so.0.0.0Partial or unexisting vectorization - No issue detected00.2657.1478.57
×