options
********************************************************************************

MAQAO 2.16.3 - Build information not available || 2023/02/19

/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS c=config_SVE.lua xp=OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E --replace 

CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core" ppn=1  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 2 --bind-to core" ppn=2  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 4 --bind-to core" ppn=4  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core" ppn=8  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 16 --bind-to core" ppn=16  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 32 --bind-to core" ppn=32  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
CMD:  OMP_NUM_THREADS=1   /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof --collect-calls-info=off --xp="/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 64 --bind-to core" ppn=64  -ldi=libgromacs_mpi.so.7.0.0  -- /home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/binaries/gmx_mpi mdrun -s ion_channel.tpr -nsteps 10000 --resetstep 8000 -pin on -deffnm armclang
In run 1x1, 151 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

176 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 2x1, 172 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

141 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 4x1, 211 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

99 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 8x1, 213 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

89 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 16x1, 232 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

84 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 32x1, 265 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

82 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 64x1, 284 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

105 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

CMD:  /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao otter  -input=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/OTTER/output_manifest.csv

In run 1x1, 151 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

176 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 2x1, 172 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

141 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 4x1, 211 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

99 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 8x1, 213 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

89 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 16x1, 232 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

84 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 32x1, 265 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

82 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 64x1, 284 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

105 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

********************************************************************************

MAQAO 2.16.5 - Build information not available || 2023/03/05

/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS xp=OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E 

In run 1x1, 151 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

176 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 2x1, 172 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

141 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 4x1, 211 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

99 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 8x1, 213 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

89 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 16x1, 232 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

84 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 32x1, 265 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

82 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 64x1, 284 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

105 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

CMD:  /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao otter  -input=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/OTTER/input_manifest.csv -output=/home/eoseret/GROMACS/DATA/OV_dirs/OV1_WS_armclang_SVE_G3E/OTTER/output_manifest.csv

In run 1x1, 151 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

176 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 2x1, 172 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

141 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 4x1, 211 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

99 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 8x1, 213 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

89 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 16x1, 232 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

84 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 32x1, 265 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

82 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

In run 64x1, 284 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

105 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis

×