Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (168.58 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 2.98 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 2.98 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 2.98 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -axCORE is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.16 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (88.84%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (27.49%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (70.03%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (18.81%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (70.03%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ►5880 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 4 | 27.49 | 52.17 | 19.02 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ►5890 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 4 | 4.99 | 52.17 | 19.02 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ►4744 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 12 | 4.11 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ►305 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 12 | 3.61 | 0 | 11.8 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ►4725 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 10 | 2.59 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ►1162 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 35 | 2.46 | 3.7 | 12.96 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (29 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 29 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 33 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
| ►3319 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 12 | 2.44 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 8 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ►3285 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 16 | 2.41 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 3 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each. | 12 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 | ||||
| ►1191 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 1002 | 2.35 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (2705 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 2705 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point, limited to 1000. | 1000 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 | ||||
| ►1180 | exec | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 1002 | 2.33 | 0 | 12.5 |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (2705 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 2705 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point, limited to 1000. | 1000 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! Some static analysis are missing because the loop has too many paths. Use a higher value for --maximal_path_number option. | 0 |