********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - d7816a4ef31d96c8cb7cb54a3ec2554ac0d7ef52::20250912-183832 || 2025/09/12
/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/config.json --with-FLOPS lprof_params="btm=fp" --replace xp=/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279 -of=html
CPY: [true] /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 64 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 128 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 160 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=bunch OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/MAQAO_d7816a/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview "btm=fp" --xp="/beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 192 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /beegfs/hackathon/users/eoseret/qaas_runs_ZEN5/175-813-3609/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/aocc/oneview_results_1758153279/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
In run 8x1, 36 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.043617104332952% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
55 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.048072874917125% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 34 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.015271570176992% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
45 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0072792650898919% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 96x1, 31 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0079524584216415% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
28 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0026729647652246% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 128x1, 39 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0099957382844878% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
34 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0028982336589252% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 160x1, 40 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.010154468847759% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
34 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0020744784742419% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 192x1, 47 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.01156920953872% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
38 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.002169242277887% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
